Research in the Time of COVID-19: Challenges of Research Ethics Committees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.035.01.07Keywords:
research ethics, ethical standards, global health emergencies, ethics review, health researchAbstract
Compliance with ethics guidelines for research are even more critical in the time of emergency public health situations such as a pandemic. Underpinned by the principles laid out in the 1979 Belmont report, conduct of research at any time should focus on respect for persons, beneficence and justice. Certain Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in research ethics committees may be revised to provide a quicker turn-around and timely review. Key elements in effective review of studies include rigorousness, responsiveness and timeliness. It is crucial to recognize that ethics review committees share responsibility with researchers and its institutions, funding agencies and regulatory agencies for upholding ethical principles in research at all times.
Downloads
References
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. Available at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html.
Emanuel EJ, Wendler C, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283(2):2701-11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10819955. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701.
Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. 2017 National ethical guidelines for health and health-related research version 2. The research ethics review process. 2018. Available at http://www.ethics.healthresearch.ph/index.php/2012-04-19-05-10-10/297-2017-national-ethical-guidelines-revision.
World Health Organization. Ethical standards for research during public health emergencies: Distilling existing guidance to support COVID-19 R&D. 2020. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331507.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Research in global health emergencies: Ethical issues. 2020. https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/RGHE_full_report1.pdf.
Saxena A, Horby P, Amuasi J, et al. Ethical preparedness: Facilitating ethics review during outbreaks, recommendations from an expert panel. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060618. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x.
PHREB resolution on conduct of ethics review during COVID-19 (personal communication).
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141714. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Zhang H, Shao F, Gu J, Li L, Wang Y. Ethics committee reviews of applications for research studies at 1 hospital in China during the 2019 novel coronavirus epidemic. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1844-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32202608. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091374. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4362.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The full license text is available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode.
To request permission to translate, reproduce, download, or use articles or images for commercial reuse or business purposes from the Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies (JAFES), kindly complete the Permission Request for Use of Copyrighted Material Form and email jafes@asia.com or jafes.editor@gmail.com.
A written agreement will be issued to the requester once permission has been granted.
